• Figyelem!

  A megtekinteni kívánt tartalom inaktív.

  The New York Times
  [2016.08.23.] - MPT Web -szerkesztőség - Hírkategória: Nemzetközi hírek
  The Psychiatric Question: Is It Fair to Analyze Donald Trump From Afar?
  
  In the midst of a deeply divisive presidential campaign, more than 1,000 psychiatrists declared the Republican candidate unfit for the office, citingsevere personality defects, including paranoia, a grandiose manner and a Godlike self-image. One doctor called him “a dangerous lunatic.”The year was 1964, and after losing in a landslide, the candidate, Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona, sued the publisher of Fact magazine, which had published the survey, winning $75,000 in damages.
  
  But doctors attacked the survey, too, for its unsupported clinical language and obvious partisanship. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Associationadopted what became known as the Goldwater Rule, declaring it unethical for any psychiatrist to diagnose a public figure’s condition “unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement.”

  Kapcsolódó dokumentumok(1)

  The Psychiatric Question: Is It Fair to Analyze Donald Trump From Afar?		pdf		2016.08.23.		0,425 Mb

Vissza